Analysis waits while required checks are failing or still running.
How a review works
From inbox to published review.
The agent does the broad pass, and the brief reports exactly what it covered—including what it didn't read. You step through only the findings that could change the approval decision, high-risk first.
Ready for approval, hold, or insufficient evidence—plus what was verified and where the blind spots are.
High-risk first. Accept a tradeoff with a rationale, or turn it into a draft comment for the author.
Preview the exact payload—comment, approve, or request changes. Nothing posts until you confirm.
Every claim points to real code.
Open a finding and you get why it matters, the cited lines, and what to do about it. ReviewArc validates every citation against the pinned revision before showing it—and anything it can't validate stays labeled unverified.
- RiskWhy this finding could change your approval decision.
- CodeThe cited lines, the diff, and the discussion already on them.
- DecisionAccept the tradeoff with a rationale, or draft a comment for the author.
Local until you publish
The agent can investigate. It cannot publish for you.
ReviewArc works in its own managed copy of the repository, and the agent runs read-only—no project scripts, no commands, no writes. Notes, drafts, and decisions stay on your Mac until you confirm the review.
Read about security and local dataFree · signed and notarized · your own Codex or Claude Code